Serchen
AlphaRacks Hosting logo

AlphaRacks Hosting

★★★★★ 3.0 · 128 Reviews

What is AlphaRacks Hosting?

AlphaRacks is a premium web hosting provider based in Los Angeles, CA. Initially started in 2006 as an on-site IT consultancy firm providing support to local businesses, the AlphaRacks brand was launched in 2013 offering mainstream premium hosting services to both web start-ups and large enterprises. We currently support over 40,000 clients of all sizes in over 100 countries worldwide. Services include cPanel web hosting, bare-metal dedicated servers, and virtual private servers, offered in both standardized and custom tailored configurations. Support is provided 24x7x365 by our in-house dedicated staff; services are provided by leveraging strategic partnerships of top tier facility and network providers, ensuring the services we deliver are highly available; which is backed by our service level promise agreement to you.

Alternatives to AlphaRacks Hosting

See all in VPS

AlphaRacks Hosting Reviews (128)

3.0
★★★★★
128 reviews
  • ★★★★★64
  • ★★★★0
  • ★★★★★0
  • ★★★★★1
  • ★★★★63

Review Summary

Generated using AI from real user reviews

AlphaRacks Hosting is overwhelmingly unreliable and untrustworthy based on these recent reviews.

The vast majority of users report extended outages lasting days to months with no meaningful support responses. Complaints centre on servers going offline suddenly, tickets going unanswered for extended periods, and support staff either ignoring issues or providing generic, unhelpful replies. Multiple reviews mention the company acquiring other hosting brands—RIJX, WootHosting, WootLyHosting, HostMyBytes, PSK Hosting—and immediately degrading their service quality after takeover. Several customers describe the experience as a "nightmare" and warn others that positive reviews appear fake. One reviewer noted security issues including malware and coinminer infections on provisioned VPS instances, coupled with unauthorized recurring charges after cancellation.

A small minority of customers (roughly 10 reviews out of 50) report good performance, fast support, and good value, typically citing low cost and reliable uptime over months or years. However, these positive accounts are dwarfed by recent failures, and reviewers themselves note that the acquisition-related outages have destroyed previously good services. One defender suggested acquired customers should "give them time to settle," but current downtime has lasted weeks without resolution.

The consistent pattern across negative reviews—no communication during major outages, poor support responsiveness, and service degradation after company acquisitions—strongly suggests systemic operational and management problems. This is not a minor issue affecting a few users.

Related Categories